ctseawa: (clue pill)
ctseawa ([personal profile] ctseawa) wrote2009-03-19 09:33 am

They're at it again

If you actually like being able to access whatever you deem appropriate for reading then you might want to comment on this proposal that would allow certain religious (and other similarly-minded) groups to censor the internet in the name of "protecting the children". (Parents, do your jobs and stop trying to make others do it for you!) This time they would do it via ICANN rules about ports and routing, bypassing any kinds of constraints or restraints.

I've sent my objection to it in.

I'm really getting sick of religious groups pushing their fucktard ideas on us in the forms of laws (or constitutional amendments, e.g. the recent mormon destruction of Californian marriage rights). I don't think hell exists but if it did there would be a special place in it for people who do this.

[identity profile] londubh.livejournal.com 2009-03-19 09:02 pm (UTC)(link)
Is there any way that would be more effective to fight this than posting on this article or their website?

[identity profile] ctseawa.livejournal.com 2009-03-19 09:37 pm (UTC)(link)
You could send a letter of comment to ICANN.