They're at it again

[ctseawa]

If you actually like being able to access whatever you deem appropriate for reading then you might want to comment on this proposal that would allow certain religious (and other similarly-minded) groups to censor the internet in the name of "protecting the children". (Parents, do your jobs and stop trying to make others do it for you!) This time they would do it via ICANN rules about ports and routing, bypassing any kinds of constraints or restraints.

I've sent my objection to it in.

I'm really getting sick of religious groups pushing their fucktard ideas on us in the forms of laws (or constitutional amendments, e.g. the recent mormon destruction of Californian marriage rights). I don't think hell exists but if it did there would be a special place in it for people who do this.

Comments

[elka-woof.livejournal.com]

Protecting the children? Protecting the CHILDREN? Most of the randiest, most offensive things on the internet are posted by children. Screw protecting the children, why don't you protect ME! That's right, fundies, protect me from your children. Try raising them properly, for starters. Maybe if you did something other than other than repressing them they wouldn't feel the need to take out their frustration by posting images of tub girl on 4chan all day.